Search
Close this search box.

Review of Affordable Housing Funding Programs

Date:

November 2023

Expiry Date:

December 2026

Current Status:

Intent Not Met

Sponsors:

Wheatland County

District:

2 – Central

Year:

2019

Convention:

Fall

Category:

Community Services

Status:

Intent Not Met

Vote Results:

Carried

Preamble:

WHEREAS the current application process for the Affordable Housing Partnership Program requires municipalities to commit significant work and financial resources to unique projects without the assurance of receiving grants; and

WHEREAS municipalities and organizations that are partially funded by municipal requisitions (such as housing management bodies) have the responsibility to ensure the prudent use of funds derived from taxation from municipal ratepayers; and

WHEREAS Alberta’s expansive geography presents distinct rural challenges, especially for seniors wishing to age within their communities where family often plays a pivotal caregiving role; and

WHEREAS the unpredictable nature of the application process results in wasted time, resources, and financial commitments, along with frustrated community expectations when grants are not received; and

WHEREAS the current process may hinder municipalities’ capability to plan and execute large capital purchases effectively;

Operative Clause:

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rural Municipalities of Alberta (RMA) advocate to the Government of Alberta (GOA) to review the application process for the Affordable Housing Partnership Program and any future affordable housing funding programs to minimize financial commitments that municipal applicants are required to make to a project before the grant funding is confirmed; and

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the RMA advocate to the GOA to use a data-driven allocation model to determine funding priorities, incorporating a distinct rural-focused stream within this system; and

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the RMA advocate to the GOA to create scalable, replicable modular designs for affordable housing projects that could be utilized by housing management bodies for approved projects.

Member Background:

In Alberta, municipalities are at the forefront of addressing housing needs, emphasizing the creation of unified communities through various housing initiatives. This includes housing needs for all age groups and often involves collaboration with entities like housing management bodies. Given their central role in delivering housing projects, it is pertinent to acknowledge their partial funding through municipal requisitions, directly derived from municipal taxation.

The Affordable Housing Partnership Program, in its current form, is a “double-edged sword.” While it offers potential avenues for housing solutions, the associated unpredictability of the grant system is a pressing concern. Municipalities often find themselves in a precarious position, forced to earmark resources and navigate bureaucratic complexities, all while operating in a cloud of funding uncertainty.

Projects demand considerable resources and financial investments upfront, without any guarantee of obtaining critical provincial or federal grants. Housing management boards have historically spent funds on repeated business cases and needs assessments that utilize publicly available data. Because the application process requires a detailed budget to be submitted, it requires a housing body to hire numerous professional service consultants including project management, construction management and architectural firms to develop project design and the corresponding budget. The preference of “construction ready” applications further exacerbates the issue.

This approach is fiscally strenuous, forcing municipalities to allocate substantial resources without the certainty of external funding. The uncertainty does not just strain budgets; it also places a cloud over long-term strategic planning for community development.

Another dimension to this challenge is community dynamics. When housing projects are publicized or initiated, they set high community expectations. Any subsequent delay or cancellation of these initiatives due to funding shortfalls can lead to significant community disappointment. The result of this causes an erosion of trust in municipal endeavors, impacting community morale and perception.

The repercussions are often subtly but significantly felt by municipal ratepayers. Their tax contributions form the backbone of these projects, and uncertainties in project fruition place their contributions in a precarious position. For many ratepayers, the local housing projects are more than just infrastructure; they represent hopes for community growth, stability, and prosperity.

A streamlined and predictable grant application process for housing projects in Alberta is paramount. This will not only ensure efficient administrative processes but also foster community trust by reducing uncertainties surrounding project funding and realization. The benefits of such a revision would resonate through the province, offering municipalities a clearer pathway to housing development while aligning with community expectations and fiscal responsibilities.

In light of the pressing need to expand affordable housing options in Alberta, it is imperative that we take a page from the playbook of Premier Peter Lougheed’s era of efficient hospital construction. During that time, Alberta saw significant capital investment in healthcare facilities, with a focus on streamlined design that was replicated in about 20 builds across various communities. This standardization facilitated timely approval of construction-ready projects, eliminating the need to expend tax dollars on multiple sets of pre-design, schematic design, design development, and architectural construction documents for each new facility. We are requesting applying similar methodology to affordable housing project construction. Utilizing such a process could not only save millions of dollars per project, but it could also expedite construction timelines and slash bureaucratic red tape surrounding funding allocation. As we consider adopting a similar approach, it is crucial that extensive engagement be conducted to ensure that the new scalable modular designs meet the diverse and evolving needs of Albertans, now and into the future.

In conclusion, by revisiting and refining the Affordable Housing Partnership Program’s application process, Alberta can bolster housing initiatives, enhance community trust, and ensure prudent fiscal management across its municipalities. It is a step towards a more stable, transparent, and community-centered housing future.

RMA Background:

15-23S: Capital Funding Support for Housing Management Bodies

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rural Municipalities of Alberta advocate to the Government of Alberta to increase funding to housing management bodies to alleviate the affordability crisis and provide funding for capital upkeep or replacement needed to sustain supportive living at senior lodges.

Click here to view the full resolution.

12-22F: Restore Grants-in-Lieu of Taxes for Public Housing Management Authorities

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rural Municipalities of Alberta (RMA) advocate to the Government of Alberta to increase funding towards the Rent Assistance Benefit program; and

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the RMA advocate to the Government of Alberta to reinstate grants in-lieu-of taxes for housing units operated by public housing management bodies; and

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that RMA advocate to the Government of Alberta to revise the Alberta Housing Act by replacing “may” with “shall” in section 27(1) and by deleting section 27(2).

Click here to view the full resolution.

Government Response:

Seniors, Community and Social Services

Excerpt from Resolution: “…BE IT RESOLVED that the RMA advocate to the GoA to review the application process for the Affordable Housing Partnership Program and any future affordable housing funding programs to minimize financial commitments that municipal applicants are required to make to a project before the grant funding is confirmed.”

During the Affordable Housing Partnership Program (AHPP) application period, a list of action items for the next intake is complied. At the end of each intake period, the program and action items are reviewed to identify areas for improvement. Since the first AHPP intake, which closed January 11, 2023, SCSS has implemented an online application form and made minor changes to the HPP Guidelines to provide clarity about the program and requirements.

Under the HPP, eligible housing developments may receive a maximum provincial contribution of up to one-third the total cost of the project. The AHPP relies on partnerships with other levels of government, including municipal and federal levels, to make financial commitments to help bring housing projects to fruition. SCSS has approved 30 projects through the AHPP, allocating about $125 million in grant funding to support more than 1,100 new homes in 11 communities across the province. We look forward to announcing the successful projects from the most recent round of funding in the coming weeks. Details on the next intake period will be available in spring 2024.

Excerpt from Resolution: “…BE IT RESOLVED that the RMA advocate to the GoA to use a data-driven allocation model to determine funding priorities, incorporating a distinct rural-focused stream within this system.”

The department developed an improved evaluation tool for the second AHPP intake. It uses data from the online application to score applications based on the AHPP Guidelines’ minimum requirements and SCSS evaluation criteria. The evaluation tool also helps prioritize and rank projects and provides a starting point for the valuation process. Applications are evaluated individually to ensure unique applications and details not captured by a score are considered. For example, projects proposed for rural locations take into account rental data, construction costs and other factors relevant to rural housing projects.

SCSS takes a balanced approach to grants for projects in cities and rural locations.

Excerpt from Resolution: “…BE IT RESOLVED that the RMA advocate to the GoA to create scalable, replicable modular designs for affordable housing projects that could be utilized by housing management bodies for approved projects.”

There is currently no plan to crate a scalable and replicable modular design system for HMBs to use for approved affordable housing projects. The GoA follows the ASHC Design and Technical Guidelines, outlining the minimum standards for developing and delivering provincially funded affordable housing. These guidelines provide design principles and technical specifications for affordable housing construction, allowing for communities to decide what works for their specific situation. For more information about the ASHC Design and Technical Guidelines, please visit open.alberta.ca/publications/design-and-technical-guidelines-ashc.

Development:

The RMA is disappointed to see that no action has been taken towards meeting any of the asks of this resolution.

In a response to the first ask, the Ministry indicates the application process is under continuous review. However, the response does not comment on the significant resources and time commitment municipalities must make or suggest possible solutions to alleviate the burden the application process presents for rural municipalities.

In reference to the second ask, the Minister provided some insight into how applications are scored, but not how the current evaluation components were developed or how a balanced approach to rural and urban affordable housing ensures agreement with the Government of Alberta’s Stronger Foundations affordable housing strategy, a 10 year strategy to improve and expand affordable housing in Alberta.

The Ministry did not express any plans to create a repository of affordable housing. However, housing has emerged as a major priority for the federal government. In spring 2024 the Government of Canada announced Canada’s Housing Plan with a series of funding announcements around building more homes, rental and financing agreements, construction programs, and even funds for municipal housing infrastructure. One part of this series of announcements included plans “revive a revised version of a wartime housing effort: a standardized pre-approved design catalogue, with the aim of helping speed up construction.” RMA will continue to monitor the implementation of these federal funding programs as they impact Alberta’s rural municipalities.

RMA assigns this resolution a status of Intent Not Met and will continue to advocate on this issue. RMA will undertake a review of the application process to better understand areas of improvement and grant selection criteria and continue to monitor Federal Housing developments.

Provincial Ministries:

Seniors

Provincial Boards and Organizations:

None reported.
Federal Ministries and Bodies:
None reported.

Internal Notes:

None reported.