+ RMA Rural Municipalities
of Alberta

Resolution 21-22F

Loss of Agricultural Land to Renewable Energy Projects

November 9, 2022
Expiry Date:
December 1, 2025
Active Status:
Mountain View County
2 - Central
Intent Not Met
Vote Results:

WHEREAS the Government of Alberta and the Government of Canada have a mandate to transition to a low carbon economy; and

WHEREAS renewable energy has been determined to be one way to transition to a low carbon economy; and

WHEREAS renewable energy projects in Alberta have been and continue to be located on productive agricultural lands; and

WHEREAS  Alberta’s Renewable Energy Act  has mandated that 30% of electricity generated must come from renewable energy sources by 2030; and

WHEREAS the Alberta Electric System Operator calculates, for 2021, 17% of electricity generation in Alberta comes from renewable energy sources; and

WHEREAS achieving this growth in renewable energy generation by 2030 could result, according to industry calculations, in a further 120,000 acres (187.5 sections) of agricultural land being lost; and

WHEREAS no quantitative studies have been completed in Alberta that calculate the overall effect to the economy from the loss of agricultural land and subsequent food production as the result of renewable energy projects;

Operative Clause:

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rural Municipalities of Alberta request the Government of Alberta to work collaboratively on policy that will find a balance between the development of renewable energy and protection of valuable agriculture lands.

Member Background:

Albertans must ensure that the development of small and large scale renewable energy projects do not come at the price of losing productive agriculture lands. Without oversight as to where these developments may occur, the price of farmland will significantly increase, putting it out of  reach  for agriculture producers and into the hands of speculators who believe they can profit from the land rental rates being offered by the renewable energy companies.

The Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) approval process for renewable energy projects on private land currently has little to no regard for the rural municipalities’ statutory plans or requirement for consultation with the Municipalities. Rural municipalities have historically been the stewards of long-term land use planning within municipal  borders, through municipal development plans, land use bylaws and area structure plans. The creation and update of these plans include significant public consultation with residents, landowners, businesses, and our neighboring municipal partners. Most, if not all rural municipalities are proud to say agriculture producers are valued, and this is reflected in the focus on preservation of agriculture lands in all our statutory documents.

Mountain View County  supports the provincial strategy of development of renewable energy and reductions in carbon emissions; however,  it is imperative to learn from past mistakes, with the focus being on upfront development of resources with no consideration for the unintended or ignored long-term costs.  Since the province retains full authority over land use planning with respect to renewable energy development, we also believe the Government of Alberta should be responsible for implementing policy to protect agriculture lands and find a balance to protect the two most important industries in Alberta: energy and agriculture.

The first step in this process is the collection and analysis of all pertinent data in order to provide a complete picture of the long-term costs and benefits. This cannot be another short-sighted approach to an issue without understanding and calculating the future consequences it brings.

RMA Background:

RMA has no active resolutions directly related to this issue.

Government Response:

Alberta Agriculture and Irrigation

In 2016, the Renewable Energy Act established the “30 in 30” target, which states at least 30 per cent of the electric energy produced in Alberta must be produced from renewable energy resources by 2030. In addition, the deregulated electricity market and rich solar and wind resources have resulted in a surge of investment in renewable energy projects in Alberta. Protecting individual property rights, conserving Alberta’s finite agricultural land base and the growth of renewable energy resources are important – and at times conflicting – priorities.

Agriculture and Irrigation (AGI) is committed to working collaboratively with Rural Municipalities of Alberta and other stakeholders to identify issues with commercial solar developments on agricultural land and opportunities to resolve them.

Affordability and Utilities

Electricity projects must be approved by the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC), who review all projects to ensure that they are in the public interest. The AUC’s review process takes into consideration impacts to people, land, and the environment and can include noise, visual impact, traffic/roadways, land use, impacts to irrigation, and a variety of other environmental impacts such as species at risk, native grasses, water, wastewater, and conservation of soil.

Commercial wind and solar developments are only built on private land in Alberta and provide another source of revenue for landowners. Respecting property rights is a tenet of the Government of Alberta and limiting development options for private landowners would infringe on these rights. The AUC does not determine if and where in the province power generation should occur as electric generation is deregulated in Alberta.

The AUC decision-making process is independent and individual project applications are not influenced by government departments outside alignment with relevant legislation. I would encourage the RMA and its members to contact the AUC to discuss the value of agricultural lands to the local communities and how this can be further considered in its assessment process.


The RMA recently formed a member committee to review the mandates of quasi-judicial agencies, as well as if and to what extent they act in the public interest and the role of municipalities in their approval processes. Through this committee and corresponding report, Based on the committee’s findings, RMA has put forward several recommendations, many of which pertain specifically to the AUC:

  • That the GOA and quasi-judicial agencies work with stakeholders to develop an approach to integrating land use impact assessments and reclamation requirements into project approvals
  • That the GOA and quasi-judicial agencies work together and with stakeholders, including municipalities, to regularly adapt approval processes to industry changes.
  • That the AER and AUC adopt NRB requirements related to aligning projects with municipal development plans
  • That municipalities have automatic status as directly affected parties and automatic standing at hearings

Further, the AUC has recently launched an inquiry into electrical generation projects, including their impacts on agricultural lands. The RMA provided insight into this through a comment matrix and recommended:

  • The AUC should specifically include a consideration of the land and soil type to the proposed project, as well as other considerations such as current and historical land use, climate and weather trends, drought and flood risk etc. within their project review process.
  • Rural municipalities have a long history of balancing preservation of agricultural land with development and their input should be weighted in the approval process.

RMA sees the need for increased municipal input in the approval process for the AUC as a way to balance the need for growth and the need to preserve agricultural lands. The inquiry is set to be completed in early 2024 and the RMA hopes to see vast improvement to the protection of agricultural lands in the renewable energy approval process.

With the AUC inquiry ongoing, this resolution is assigned a status of Intent Not Met. RMA will continue to participate in the AUC inquiry process and ensure a rural voice is heard.

Provincial Ministries:
Agriculture and Forestry
Back to Resolutions Database