+ RMA Rural Municipalities
of Alberta

Resolution 13-09F

Amendment to Section 225 of the MGA - Involving Petitions

January 1, 2009
Expiry Date:
November 30, 2012
Active Status:
Lac La Biche County
5 - Edmonton East
Municipal Governance and Finances
Incomplete Information
Vote Results:

WHEREAS the Province of Alberta has established the Municipal Government Act to govern the actions of municipalities in Alberta; and

WHEREAS sections 220 to 226 of the Municipal Government Act define the rules for submitting and receiving petitions in Alberta municipalities; and

WHEREAS section 225 of the Municipal Government Act does not allow petitioners to request to the Chief Administrative Officer to exclude their name when counting petitioners; and

WHEREAS the exclusion provisions under section 225 are very narrow and do not contemplate a number of circumstances which potentially can arise and should be considered in counting petitioners;

Operative Clause:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Alberta Association of Municipal Districts and Counties urge the Government of Alberta to amend section 225 of the Municipal Government Act to include provisions which require the Chief Administrative Officer, when counting the number of petitioners on a petition to exclude the name of a person  who provides a statutory declaration to the Chief Administrative Officer, prior to the declaration of the CAO on sufficiency of the petition, that their signature was:
1. Not witnessed in accordance with section 224 of the Municipal Government Act;
2. Provided after receiving  inaccurate information regarding the petition;
3. Provided under duress;
4. Provided while the petitioner was in an intoxicated state; or
5. Forged.

Member Background:

The CAO of Lac La Biche County received a petition in accordance with section 231 of the MGA.  While determining sufficiency of the petition, County Administration received several requests from petitioners to have their name excluded from the petition.  Although unsubstantiated, these claims demonstrate a weakness in the legislation and include the following: 
1. The witness listed on the petition was not physically present when the petitioner signed;
2. The intent of the petition was not communicated to the petitioner;
3. The petitioners signed what they thought was a sign-in sheet at a social gathering;
4. Petitioners were placed under duress while signing; and
5. The petition was signed when the petitioner was in an intoxicated state. 

Section 225 of the MGA details the process for counting and excluding petitioners.  Currently, this section does not allow a petitioner to submit a statutory declaration to the CAO requesting that their signature to be excluded for any reason.  Adopting this resolution will ensure that signatures listed on a petition adequately represent the intent of the petitioners.

RMA Background:

The AAMDC has no current resolutions directly related to this issue.

Government Response:

Municipal Affairs:
Municipal Affairs will be undertaking a staged comprehensive review of the Municipal Government Act and will take this recommendation into consideration when conducting the review.


While the Government of Alberta has responded that they will take the issue into consideration and that a review of the MGA will take place, the department continues to give no input into the substance of the resolution. The AAMDC will continue to advocate this position as such a review moves forward.

Provincial Ministries:
Municipal Affairs
Back to Resolutions Database