Modernization of Municipal Investment Authority Under the Municipal Investment Regulation

Date:

November 2026

Expiry Date:

November 2029

Current Status:

Awaiting Vote

Sponsors:

MD of Peace

District:

4 – Northern

Year:

2026

Convention:

Fall

Category:

Municipal Governance and Finances

Status:

Awaiting Vote

Vote Results:

Awaiting Vote

Preamble:

WHEREAS Section 250 of the Municipal Government Act authorizes municipalities to invest surplus funds only in investments permitted by provincial regulation; and

WHEREAS the Municipal Investment Regulation (AR 149/2022) restricts municipal investment opportunities primarily to low-risk, low-yield investments that often fail to preserve the long-term purchasing power of municipal reserves; and

WHEREAS many Alberta municipalities maintain significant long-term reserves for infrastructure replacement, capital planning, and financial sustainability that are well suited to diversified investment strategies; and

WHEREAS other Canadian jurisdictions have modernized municipal investment frameworks using prudent investor principles while maintaining rigorous governance, transparency, and accountability; and

WHEREAS Alberta municipalities have the governance structures, fiduciary responsibilities, financial oversight, and access to professional investment expertise necessary to prudently manage diversified investment portfolios.

Operative Clause:

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rural Municipalities of Alberta advocate to the Government of Alberta to amend the Investment Regulation (AR 149/2022) under the Municipal Government Act to permit municipalities to pursue balanced and diversified investment portfolios, including equities and professionally managed pooled investment funds, consistent with prudent investor principles and appropriate governance, transparency, reporting, and oversight requirements.

Member Background:

Alberta’s current investment framework prioritizes capital preservation but significantly limits long-term investment performance, even reserve funds that may not be required for decades.

When inflation exceeds the returns available through permitted investments, municipal reserves lose purchasing power, reducing municipalities’ ability to fund future infrastructure and essential services.

Modern public-sector investment practices emphasize a prudent investor approach rather than a prescriptive list of allowable investments. Diversification, professional management, and robust governance have consistently demonstrated stronger long-term, risk-adjusted outcomes.

Saskatchewan’s SUMAlnvest model and similar approaches across Canada demonstrate that municipalities can responsibly achieve improved long-term returns while maintaining public accountability.

Rationale for changes to existing public sector investment practices:

  1. Erosion of Real Value: Current investment returns frequently fail to keep pace with inflation.
  2. Investment Horizon Mismatch: Long-term reserve funds should be permitted to follow long-term investment strategies.
  3. Alignment with Canadian Best Practices: Other provinces successfully apply prudent investor models.
  4. Intergenerational Fairness: Protecting reserve values reduces the burden on future taxpayers.
  5. Economic Development: Greater flexibility could support Alberta-based investment opportunities where appropriate.
  6. Improved Risk Management: Diversification reduces concentration risk while improving long-term resilience.
  7. Enhanced Fiscal Sustainability: Higher sustainable returns strengthen municipal finances and reduce pressure on taxation.
  8. Transparency and Accountability: Council-approved investment policies, annual reporting, and professional oversight remain essential safeguards.

Modernizing Alberta’s Municipal Investment Regulation will align municipal investment authority with contemporary public-sector standards while maintaining prudent governance and accountability. This measured approach will better protect the long-term value of municipal reserves, strengthen financial sustainability, reduce pressure on future property taxation, and enhance municipalities’ ability to responsibly plan for future infrastructure and service needs.

RMA Background:

RMA has no active resolutions directly related to this issue.

Government Response:
None reported.

Development:

None reported.

Provincial Ministries:

None reported.

Provincial Boards and Organizations:

None reported.
Federal Ministries and Bodies:
None reported.

Internal Notes:

None reported.